Kare Lawyers vs Rin Kim Law compared on fees, specialists and offices (2026)
On our October 2026 scoring of Kare Lawyers vs Rin Kim Law, Kare Lawyers scores 85/100 (11th in Queensland) and Rin Kim Law scores 40/100 (98th). Only Kare Lawyers has a QLS Accredited Specialist, and both have offices in Greater Brisbane. Scores count public records, not case results.
At a glance
|
Kare Lawyers11th in Queensland |
85/100 |
|---|---|
|
Rin Kim Law98th in Queensland |
40/100 |
|
Both in |
Greater Brisbane |
Facts checked 20 Oct 2026.
Kare Lawyers vs Rin Kim Law side by side
Every fact below comes live from each firm’s checked profile. Swap either firm, or add a third, with the lists.
Kare Lawyers vs Rin Kim Law, side by side
| Fact | Kare Lawyers | Rin Kim Law |
|---|---|---|
| Score (out of 100) | 85/100 | 40/100 |
| Best for | Doyle's 'Leading' tier plaintiff firm for motor vehicle, work injury and public liability claims (2025–2026) | Korean-, Thai- and Mandarin-speaking claimants. Multilingual Brisbane CBD team. |
| Has a QLS Accredited Specialist | Yes | Not published |
| Published fee terms | Acts on a speculative 'No Win – No Fee' basis for eligible personal injury matters: professional fees and disb…Acts on a speculative 'No Win – No Fee' basis for eligible personal injury matters: professional fees and disbursements payable only if the claim succeeds. Policy states fees 'may include a "success fee" or uplift' reflecting the firm's risk, and that the 50/50 rule (Legal Profession Act 2007) is applied to all speculative matters. 'Standard conditions regarding outlays and costs apply.' | States 'Rin Kim Law is a no win, no fee injury compensation firm'. Clients pay nothing unless and until the ca…States 'Rin Kim Law is a no win, no fee injury compensation firm'. Clients pay nothing unless and until the case is won and compensation received. Offers a complimentary, obligation-free initial consultation. FAQ explains the Queensland 50/50 rule (fees under a speculative agreement capped at 50% of net settlement, Legal Profession Act 2007) and lists disbursements such as medical reports, records and barrister's fees. |
| Doyle's Guide | Leading 2026 | Not listed |
| Google rating | 4.9 (31) | 4.9 (130) |
| Queensland offices | Spring Hill | Brisbane City |
| Claim types | 5 of 8 Car accident (CTP), Medical negligence, Public liability, TPD & superannuation, Workers compensation | 4 of 8 Car accident (CTP), Public liability, TPD & superannuation, Workers compensation |
| Firm type | Independent Queensland firm | Independent Queensland firm |
| Founded | Not published | 2020 |
| Facts checked | 20 October 2026 | 20 October 2026 |
Facts come from each firm’s profile, with sources and check dates. How scores work.
Key differences between Kare Lawyers and Rin Kim Law
Which firm suits which need
No firm suits everyone. For each common need, this shows which of the two firms meets it, from checked public records:
|
If you want |
Consider |
Why |
|---|---|---|
|
A QLS Accredited Specialist in Personal Injuries Law |
Checked on the QLS register |
|
|
A Doyle’s Guide 2025 or 2026 listing |
Doyle’s Queensland plaintiff lists |
|
|
Fee terms you can read before you call |
Both firms |
Published on the firm’s website |
|
Medical negligence claims |
Listed by Kare Lawyers only |
About Kare Lawyers
Kare Lawyers is a Brisbane law practice. Kare Lawyers Pty Ltd (ABN 11 610 961 334) operates the practice. See the full Kare Lawyers profile.
About Rin Kim Law
Rin Kim Law is a Brisbane compensation and employment law practice. Rin Kim Law Pty Ltd (ABN 13 644 904 852) operates it. See the full Rin Kim Law profile.
How we compared them
Both firms are scored out of 100 on the same public records: a QLS Accredited Specialist (25 points), Doyle’s Guide listings (up to 20), Google rating (up to 20), fee terms published on the firm’s website (15), claim types (up to 10) and Queensland offices (up to 10). Neither firm paid to appear, and we take no referral fees. Read the full method.
Frequently asked questions
